Palindrome Linked List
To solve this coding challenge, we need to determine whether a given singly linked list is a palindrome. A linked list is considered a palindrome if it reads the same forwards and backwards.
We aim to solve this within O(n) time complexity and O(1) space complexity, which means we have to be efficient both in terms of running time and auxiliary space usage.
Explanation
- Initial Constraints Understanding :
- We are given a singly linked list where the number of nodes can be up to 100,000.
- Each node can contain an integer value between 0 and 9.
- Key Concepts :
- A palindrome reads the same forwards and backwards.
- In O(n) time, we can traverse the list twice at most or use a two-pointer technique.
- For O(1) space, we must be mindful not to use extra memory proportional to the input size.
- Steps to Solve :
- Step 1 : Use a slow and fast pointer technique to find the middle of the linked list.
- The slow pointer moves one step at a time while the fast pointer moves two steps. When the fast pointer reaches the end, the slow pointer will be at the middle.
- Step 2 : Reverse the second half of the linked list.
- Starting from the middle, reverse the links of the second half of the list.
- Step 3 : Compare both halves.
- Traverse from the head to the middle and from the middle to the end (reversed second half) and compare each corresponding node.
- If all corresponding nodes are equal, the list is a palindrome.
- Step 4 : Restore the original list (optional).
- Depending on requirements, you might want to restore the list to its original state by reversing back the second half.
Detailed Steps in Pseudocode
Step 1: Find the Middle of the Linked List
# Initialize two pointers, slow and fast.
pointer_slow = head
pointer_fast = head
# Move the slow pointer one step and the fast pointer two steps at a time.
# When the fast pointer reaches the end, the slow pointer will be at the middle.
while pointer_fast is not NULL and pointer_fast.next is not NULL:
pointer_slow = pointer_slow.next
pointer_fast = pointer_fast.next.next
Step 2: Reverse the Second Half of the Linked List
# Initialize previous pointer to NULL.
previous_node = NULL
current_node = pointer_slow
# Reverse the second half of the list.
while current_node is not NULL:
temp_next = current_node.next # Store next node.
current_node.next = previous_node # Reverse current node's pointer.
previous_node = current_node # Move to the next node.
current_node = temp_next
Step 3: Compare Both Halves
# Initialize pointers to start of the list and start of the reversed second half.
pointer_left = head
pointer_right = previous_node
# Compare the values in the two halves.
while pointer_right is not NULL:
if pointer_left.val != pointer_right.val:
# If values do not match, it's not a palindrome.
return False
pointer_left = pointer_left.next
pointer_right = pointer_right.next
# If all values matched, it is a palindrome.
return True
Step 4: Optional (Restore Original List)
# Reverse the second half back to its original form (if needed).
previous_node = NULL
current_node = pointer_right
while current_node is not NULL:
temp_next = current_node.next
current_node.next = previous_node
previous_node = current_node
current_node = temp_next
By following these detailed steps methodically, we can efficiently determine if the given linked list is a palindrome in linear time and constant space.