K Th Smallest In Lexicographical Order
To solve this coding challenge, we need to find the k-th smallest lexicographical number in the range from 1 to n. Given the constraints that \( n \) can be as large as \( 10^9 \), a direct approach of generating and sorting all numbers up to \( n \) won't be efficient. Instead, we can use a more nuanced approach inspired by traversing a prefix tree (trie) to find the k-th number.
Explanation
The main idea is to iteratively find the prefix that matches the k-th smallest lexicographical number. The challenge can be broken down into the following steps:- Count the steps between prefixes : We need to count how many numbers exist between a given prefix and the next prefix in the lexicographical order. This helps in deciding whether the k-th number is within the current prefix block or if we should skip to the next prefix.
-
Iterate to find the correct prefix
: Starting from the prefix
, iteratively determine whether to move to the next sibling prefix or go deeper into the current prefix.
1 -
Adjust k accordingly
: Each time we know how many steps we've counted, update
to reflect the remaining steps.
k -
Define a helper function
that will count how many lexicographical numbers are there between the given prefix and the next prefix up to the boundary
count_steps(prefix, n).n -
Initialize the prefix with
and decrement
1by 1 because we start counting fromk.1 -
Use a loop to continue adjusting the prefix until
reaches
k.0 - Inside this loop, use the helper function to count the steps:
-
If the steps are less than or equal to
, that means the k-th number is not within the current prefix but further ahead. Move to the next sibling prefix and adjust
k.k -
If the steps are more than
, that means the k-th number is within the current prefix. Move deeper into the prefix by multiplying it by
kand decrementing10byk.1 - Return the correct prefix which now represents the k-th smallest number.
- count_steps(prefix, n) :
-
This function calculates how many numbers exist between the given prefix and the next prefix up to
.
n -
For example, if our prefix is
, this counts
1but not beyond1, 10, 100, ..., 19, 190, ..., 199.n - find_kth_number(n, k) :
-
Initialize
as
prefixbecause this is the starting point.1 -
Decrease
by 1 since the smallest number (starting point) is already considered part of the search.
k -
Enter a loop to adjust the prefix until
becomes zero. During each iteration:
k -
Use
to understand the number of steps (numbers) available in the current prefix block.
count_steps -
If these steps are less than or equal to
, skip these steps as the k-th number is beyond this prefix, and update
kto the next sibling. Adjustprefixby subtracting these steps.k -
If the steps are more than
, the k-th number lies within the current prefix -- go deeper into the prefix by multiplying it by
kand decrement10bykreflecting the move downwards.1 -
Once
is exhausted, the current prefix is the k-th smallest lexicographical number within the range from 1 to
k.n
Detailed Steps in Pseudocode
Pseudocode with Comments
Define function count_steps(prefix, n):
Initialize curr as prefix
Initialize next as prefix + 1
Initialize steps as 0
While curr <= n:
# Add the minimal steps between curr and next or limited by n+1
steps += min(n + 1, next) - curr
# Move to the next level in the lexicographical order
curr *= 10
next *= 10
Return steps
Define function find_kth_number(n, k):
Initialize prefix as 1
Decrement k by 1 # Because we start counting from 1
While k > 0:
steps = count_steps(prefix, n)
If steps <= k:
# k-th number is not in the current prefix range but further ahead
# Move to the next prefix sibling
prefix += 1
k -= steps
Else:
# k-th number is within the current prefix range
# Move deeper, go down to the next level with the current prefix
prefix *= 10
k -= 1
Return prefix