Count The Repetitions
To solve this coding challenge, you need to determine the maximum integer \( m \) such that the string representation \(\text{str2}\) concatenated \( m \) times can be obtained from the string representation \(\text{str1}\) concatenated \( n1 \) times. This is aided by efficiently mapping how characters in \( s1 \) align to characters in \( s2 \).
Explanation
- Problem Understanding :
- Given two strings \( s1 \) and \( s2 \) and their respective repetition counts \( n1 \) and \( n2 \).
- We need to calculate how many times we can form \( \text{str2} = s2 \) \( n2 \) times from \( \text{str1} = s1 \) \( n1 \) times.
- Initial Approach :
- Since directly constructing strings \( \text{str1} \) and \( \text{str2} \) is computationally infeasible due to high \( n1 \) and \( n2 \), we focus on simulating the transformations indirectly.
- Use a Dynamic Programming (DP) approach where we map progressions of \( s2 \) within \( s1 \).
- Steps :
- Construct a DP table where \( dp[i] \) represents the state of alignment within \( s2 \) after processing each character of \( s1 \).
- For each character in \( s1 \), update the count of complete repetitions of \( s2 \) whenever the end of \( s2 \) is reached.
- Continue tracing how far we can go in \( s2 \) after each character of \( s1 \).
- Algorithm :
-
Build a DP table
dp
dp[i]
- Iterate over \( n1 \) repetitions updating the state of \( s2 \) and counting complete \( s2 \) repetitions.
- Calculate the maximum count of complete repetitions of \( \text{str2} \) in \( \text{str1} \).
- Initialization :
- Create a DP array to track how \( s2 \) can be traversed within \( s1 \).
- Processing \( n1 \) repetitions of \( s1 \) :
- Traverse the DP table to compute how many \( s2 \) repetitions happen within \( n1 \) repetitions of \( s1 \).
- Return the Result :
- Return the computed maximum m.
Detailed Steps in Pseudocode
# Initialize the DP table for s2's length.
dp = []
for each position_in_s2 from 0 to length_of_s2:
# Initialize the next position and count of complete s2's repetitions
next_position = position_in_s2
complete_s2_repetitions = 0
for each position_in_s1 in length_of_s1:
if s1[position_in_s1] matches s2[next_position]:
next_position += 1
if next_position equals length_of_s2:
next_position = 0
complete_s2_repetitions += 1
# Store the state in DP table
dp[position_in_s2] = [next_position, complete_s2_repetitions]
current_position_s2 = 0
total_s2_repetitions = 0
for each repetition_in_n1 from 0 to n1 - 1:
# Update the total count by using the DP table
total_s2_repetitions += dp[current_position_s2][1]
current_position_s2 = dp[current_position_s2][0]
# Calculate the maximum m based on n2
maximum_m = total_s2_repetitions // n2
Return maximum_m
Summary
This approach ensures efficient calculation by leveraging DP to avoid reconstructing large strings, thus optimizing the solution to work within the constraints of the problem.
# Calculate the state transitions for s2 in s1
dp = []
for each i from 0 to length_of_s2:
# Initialize next position and count
current_next = i
current_count = 0
for each j in length_of_s1:
if s1[j] == s2[current_next]:
current_next += 1
if current_next == length_of_s2:
current_next = 0
current_count += 1
dp[i] = [current_next, current_count]
# Calculate the number of s2 repetitions within n1 repetitions of s1
current_index = 0
total_repetitions = 0
for each i from 0 to n1 - 1:
total_repetitions += dp[current_index][1]
current_index = dp[current_index][0]
# Determine maximum m based on n2
maximum_m = total_repetitions // n2
Return maximum_m