Count The Repetitions

To solve this coding challenge, you need to determine the maximum integer \( m \) such that the string representation \(\text{str2}\) concatenated \( m \) times can be obtained from the string representation \(\text{str1}\) concatenated \( n1 \) times. This is aided by efficiently mapping how characters in \( s1 \) align to characters in \( s2 \).

Explanation

  1. Problem Understanding :
    • Given two strings \( s1 \) and \( s2 \) and their respective repetition counts \( n1 \) and \( n2 \).
    • We need to calculate how many times we can form \( \text{str2} = s2 \) \( n2 \) times from \( \text{str1} = s1 \) \( n1 \) times.
  2. Initial Approach :
    • Since directly constructing strings \( \text{str1} \) and \( \text{str2} \) is computationally infeasible due to high \( n1 \) and \( n2 \), we focus on simulating the transformations indirectly.
    • Use a Dynamic Programming (DP) approach where we map progressions of \( s2 \) within \( s1 \).
  3. Steps :
    • Construct a DP table where \( dp[i] \) represents the state of alignment within \( s2 \) after processing each character of \( s1 \).
    • For each character in \( s1 \), update the count of complete repetitions of \( s2 \) whenever the end of \( s2 \) is reached.
    • Continue tracing how far we can go in \( s2 \) after each character of \( s1 \).
  4. Algorithm :
    • Build a DP table
      dp
      where
      dp[i]
      gives the next position in \( s2 \) and the count of complete repetitions of \( s2 \) after starting from position \( i \) of \( s2 \).
    • Iterate over \( n1 \) repetitions updating the state of \( s2 \) and counting complete \( s2 \) repetitions.
    • Calculate the maximum count of complete repetitions of \( \text{str2} \) in \( \text{str1} \).

    Detailed Steps in Pseudocode

  5. Initialization :
    • Create a DP array to track how \( s2 \) can be traversed within \( s1 \).
                                                
    # Initialize the DP table for s2's length.
    dp = []
    
    for each position_in_s2 from 0 to length_of_s2:
    # Initialize the next position and count of complete s2's repetitions
    next_position = position_in_s2
    complete_s2_repetitions = 0
    for each position_in_s1 in length_of_s1:
    if s1[position_in_s1] matches s2[next_position]:
    next_position += 1
    if next_position equals length_of_s2:
    next_position = 0
    complete_s2_repetitions += 1
    # Store the state in DP table
    dp[position_in_s2] = [next_position, complete_s2_repetitions]
    
                                            
  6. Processing \( n1 \) repetitions of \( s1 \) :
    • Traverse the DP table to compute how many \( s2 \) repetitions happen within \( n1 \) repetitions of \( s1 \).
                                                
    current_position_s2 = 0
    total_s2_repetitions = 0
    
    for each repetition_in_n1 from 0 to n1 - 1:
    # Update the total count by using the DP table
    total_s2_repetitions += dp[current_position_s2][1]
    current_position_s2 = dp[current_position_s2][0]
    
    # Calculate the maximum m based on n2
    maximum_m = total_s2_repetitions // n2
    
                                            
  7. Return the Result :
    • Return the computed maximum m.
                                            
Return maximum_m

                                        

Summary

This approach ensures efficient calculation by leveraging DP to avoid reconstructing large strings, thus optimizing the solution to work within the constraints of the problem.
                                            
# Calculate the state transitions for s2 in s1
dp = []

for each i from 0 to length_of_s2:
    # Initialize next position and count
    current_next = i
    current_count = 0
    for each j in length_of_s1:
        if s1[j] == s2[current_next]:
            current_next += 1
            if current_next == length_of_s2:
                current_next = 0
                current_count += 1
    dp[i] = [current_next, current_count]

# Calculate the number of s2 repetitions within n1 repetitions of s1
current_index = 0
total_repetitions = 0

for each i from 0 to n1 - 1:
    total_repetitions += dp[current_index][1]
    current_index = dp[current_index][0]

# Determine maximum m based on n2
maximum_m = total_repetitions // n2

Return maximum_m