Contains Duplicate Iii

To solve this coding challenge, we need to design an algorithm that checks if there exists any pair of indices \( (i, j) \) meeting the given conditions. Let's break this task down step by step to understand the methodology and then provide the pseudocode with extensive comments.
Step-by-Step Explanation
  1. Understanding the Objective :
    • We need to determine if there are two distinct indices \( i \) and \( j \) in the array
      nums
      such that:
      • \( i \neq j \)
      • \( |i - j| \leq \text{indexDiff} \)
      • \( |\text{nums}[i] - \text{nums}[j]| \leq \text{valueDiff} \)
  2. Constraints :
    • Array length constraints \( 2 \leq \text{nums.length} \leq 10^5 \)
    • Value constraints \( -10^9 \leq \text{nums}[i] \leq 10^9 \)
    • \( 1 \leq \text{indexDiff} \leq \text{nums.length} \)
    • \( 0 \leq \text{valueDiff} \leq 10^9 \)
  3. Initial Thoughts :
    • Using a brute-force approach, comparing every possible pair may not be efficient due to the size constraints.
    • Instead, we need a more efficient algorithm using a sliding window and a hash-based approach for quick lookups.
  4. Sliding Window Approach with Bucketing :
    • We'll use a hash map to keep track of elements within the current sliding window of
      indexDiff
      .
    • Each element
      nums[i]
      is mapped to a "bucket" based on its value divided by
      (valueDiff + 1)
      . This helps manage the range efficiently.
  5. Pseudocode :
  6.                                             
    function containsNearbyAlmostDuplicate(nums, indexDiff, valueDiff):
    if indexDiff <= 0:
    return False
    
    # Dictionary to maintain the sliding window
    seen_buckets = {}
    
    # Iterate through each number in the array
    for i from 0 to length(nums) - 1:
    # Clean the bucket window when it exceeds the indexDiff
    if i > indexDiff:
    old_bucket = nums[i - indexDiff - 1] // (valueDiff + 1)
    delete seen_buckets[old_bucket]
    
    # Find the current bucket of the element
    current_bucket = nums[i] // (valueDiff + 1)
    
    # Check the current bucket and its neighboring buckets for possible matches
    for bucket in [current_bucket, current_bucket - 1, current_bucket + 1]:
    if bucket in seen_buckets and abs(nums[i] - seen_buckets[bucket]) <= valueDiff:
    return True
    
    # Insert the current element's value in the bucket map
    seen_buckets[current_bucket] = nums[i]
    
    return False
    
                                            
    Detailed Steps in Pseudocode
  7. Function Initialization :
    • The function
      containsNearbyAlmostDuplicate
      takes three parameters:
      nums
      ,
      indexDiff
      , and
      valueDiff
      .
    • If
      indexDiff
      is less than or equal to zero, it returns False immediately because the index difference constraint cannot be satisfied.
  8. Hash Map Initialization :
    • We initialize an empty dictionary
      seen_buckets
      to store elements within the current sliding window. This will help in quickly checking if the conditions are met.
  9. Iterate Through the Array :
    • Start a loop from 0 to the length of
      nums
      minus one.
    • For each index
      i
      , check if the index exceeds the allowed index difference (
      indexDiff
      ). If it does, remove the element outside the current sliding window from
      seen_buckets
      .
  10. Determine Buckets :
    • Compute the current bucket for
      nums[i]
      by dividing it by
      (valueDiff + 1)
      .
  11. Check Neighboring Buckets :
    • For each bucket that includes the current bucket, and its immediate neighbors (previous and next bucket), check if there exists a match in
      seen_buckets
      .
    • If a matching element is found that satisfies the value difference condition, return True.
  12. Update the Hash Map :
    • If no matching element is found, update the
      seen_buckets
      with the current element's value.
  13. Return Result :
    • If no pair is found after processing the entire array, return False.
This approach ensures we have an efficient solution with a time complexity approximately of \( O(n) \) due to the single pass and constant-time lookups and deletions within the sliding window. This is crucial for handling large inputs within the given constraints effectively.